{"id":18325,"date":"2026-10-10T23:55:29","date_gmt":"2026-10-10T15:55:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/?p=18325"},"modified":"2026-10-11T00:29:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-10T16:29:43","slug":"gelatin-vs-hpmc-vs-pullulan-capsules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/gelatin-vs-hpmc-vs-pullulan-capsules\/","title":{"rendered":"Gelatin vs HPMC vs Pullulan Capsules: Key Differences & How to Choose"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"Gelatin<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

Choosing between gelatin, HPMC, and pullulan capsules is not simply a question of animal-based versus vegetarian materials. For pharmaceutical manufacturers, nutraceutical manufacturers, dietary supplement producers, and contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs), the shell must suit the formulation, production conditions, filling process, and final packaging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quick answer:<\/strong> Gelatin is often the economical starting point for conventional powders and granules. HPMC generally has lower inherent shell moisture, making it worth evaluating for hygroscopic ingredients and vegetarian products. Pullulan is a fermentation-derived alternative with promising oxygen-barrier properties demonstrated in laboratory film studies. No material is universally best: finished-capsule performance must be tested with the actual formulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shell choice also matters on an m\u00e1quina llenadora autom\u00e1tica de c\u00e1psulas<\/strong>. Differences in moisture, flexibility, dimensions, and surface behavior can affect capsule separation, closing, and rejection rates. This guide connects material properties to formulation stability and practical production checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. What Are Gelatin, HPMC and Pullulan Capsules Made Of?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

All three materials can form two-piece hard capsules consisting of a body and cap. They differ from one-piece softgel capsules, which require a different encapsulation process. Understanding the broader types of capsules<\/a> helps distinguish shell composition from capsule structure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gelatin<\/strong> is a collagen-derived protein, typically sourced from bovine or porcine materials. It has a long history of pharmaceutical use, broad availability, and well-established filling experience. Its animal origin may limit suitability for certain dietary requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

HPMC<\/strong>, or hypromellose, is a cellulose-derived polymer. It is commonly used for non-animal hard capsules and generally contains less inherent water than conventional gelatin shells. Commercial HPMC grades may differ in their gelling systems and other ingredients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pullulan<\/strong> is a polysaccharide produced through microbial fermentation. It forms films with interesting oxygen-barrier properties, but a finished capsule is not identical to a laboratory film.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For pharmaceutical and dietary supplement manufacturers, check the complete capsule specification\u2014not only the polymer name. Colorants, processing aids, dimensional tolerances, certifications, and supplier documentation can affect product suitability.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Gelatin<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

2. Gelatin vs HPMC vs Pullulan: What Are the Key Differences?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The most important differences concern moisture behavior, oxygen protection, mechanical handling, dissolution, dietary requirements, and cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Propiedad<\/th>Gelatin<\/th>HPMC<\/th>Pullulan<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Origin<\/td>Animal-derived collagen protein<\/td>Cellulose-derived polymer<\/td>Fermentation-derived polysaccharide<\/td><\/tr>
Inherent moisture<\/td>Often around 13\u201316% in conventional hard shells<\/td>Generally lower; some commercial specifications are around 3\u20138%<\/td>Grade-dependent; no reliable universal range<\/td><\/tr>
Low-humidity handling<\/td>Excessive drying can increase brittleness<\/td>Often considered for lower-moisture applications<\/td>Requires grade-specific validation<\/td><\/tr>
Moisture sorption<\/td>Relatively high<\/td>Lowest in a published three-material comparison<\/td>Below gelatin but above HPMC in that study<\/td><\/tr>
Oxygen barrier<\/td>Depends on conditions and shell construction<\/td>Depends on conditions and shell construction<\/td>Strong potential in pure-film studies; capsule-level data needed<\/td><\/tr>
Dissolution<\/td>Gelatin cross-linking can affect release<\/td>Formulation and gelling system can affect release<\/td>Finished-product testing needed<\/td><\/tr>
Dietary suitability<\/td>Animal-derived<\/td>Generally non-animal<\/td>Generally non-animal<\/td><\/tr>
Relative cost<\/td>Usually lower<\/td>Often moderately higher<\/td>Often premium-priced<\/td><\/tr>
Filling experience<\/td>Extensive<\/td>Established on compatible equipment<\/td>Confirm with supplier and filling trials<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Values are indicative rather than universal purchase specifications. Shell grade, humidity, temperature, test method, and supplier formulation matter.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moisture content is not moisture-barrier performance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A direct comparison by Yang and colleagues found that HPMC hard capsules had lower moisture sorption and equilibrium moisture content than gelatin and pullulan under the tested conditions. Pullulan showed less moisture sorption than gelatin [1].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet lower starting water content does not necessarily mean lower water-vapor permeability. Barham and colleagues found greater moisture uptake in gelatin than HPMC, but higher calculated diffusion and permeability parameters for HPMC at 0\u201340% relative humidity in their experimental system [2].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a hygroscopic formulation, these are two separate questions: how much water is initially present in the shell, and how much moisture may enter during storage? Both deserve attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mechanical behavior changes with humidity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Gelatin shells can become brittle when they lose too much moisture, increasing the risk of cracked caps or bodies during handling. Excessive moisture can also alter shell dimensions and flexibility. HPMC may offer advantages in some lower-humidity applications, but neither HPMC nor pullulan is immune to handling problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Compare actual capsule samples under the intended manufacturing environment instead of assuming one material will always run better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pullulan oxygen-barrier claims need context<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Xiao and colleagues measured low oxygen permeability in pure pullulan films within a study of pullulan\u2013alginate film systems [4]. That supports pullulan’s barrier potential; it does not establish an oxygen transmission rate for every commercial two-piece pullulan capsule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Capsule wall thickness, formulation, humidity, and the cap-body joint may change the result. Ask the shell supplier for product-specific data and verify the finished product’s stability. Avoid unsupported claims that pullulan is a fixed number of times more protective than HPMC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. How Does Capsule Shell Material Affect Product Stability?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A capsule shell interacts with its contents and the surrounding environment. Water migration, oxygen exposure, chemical interactions, and release behavior can all influence product quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moisture migration and shell brittleness<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A strongly hygroscopic powder may draw moisture from a gelatin shell. This can change the powder’s flow properties and leave the shell more vulnerable to cracking. HPMC’s lower inherent moisture makes it a useful screening option for some moisture-sensitive formulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the three-material study, HPMC and pullulan capsules reduced external moisture uptake by several model fill materials compared with gelatin under the tested conditions [1]. However, the result should not be generalized to every active ingredient or storage condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Assess shell moisture, fill-material water activity where appropriate, exposure during processing, and the selected package together.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Capsule<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Oxidation and packaging protection<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Certain vitamins, botanical ingredients, oils, and probiotic products may be oxygen-sensitive. Pullulan deserves consideration when its actual shell grade has documented barrier performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nevertheless, oxygen exposure during blending, capsule filling, and packaging also matters. A suitable high-barrier blister or bottle may contribute more to shelf life than a shell change alone. For moisture-sensitive products, compare bottle and blister packaging options<\/a> by their actual barrier materials and sealing performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Desiccants require validation: overly aggressive drying may increase the brittleness of gelatin shells. The correct design is a complete fill\u2013shell\u2013packaging system<\/strong>, not a polymer chosen in isolation.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Hard
Hard capsules in blister packs and bottles for moisture and oxygen protection<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Cross-linking, disintegration, and dissolution<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Gelatin may cross-link in the presence of certain reactive compounds or after unfavorable storage, potentially slowing shell dissolution [3]. HPMC avoids gelatin-specific protein cross-linking, but its release behavior still depends on shell formulation and fill interactions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A green tea extract study found that the tested gelatin and HPMC capsules met disintegration criteria, yet some HPMC combinations released the extract more slowly in particular dissolution media [5].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This distinction is critical for pharmaceutical manufacturers: disintegration and dissolution are not interchangeable quality measures<\/strong>. Validate the finished dosage form using the applicable pharmacopoeial methods and product requirements. USP General Chapter <1094> discusses capsule-related attributes affecting dissolution [8].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Which Capsule Material Is Best for Different Fill Materials?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Begin with the formulation’s principal risk rather than a generic ranking of capsule materials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fill or product type<\/th>Practical starting point<\/th>Critical checks<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Conventional dry powders<\/td>Gelatin<\/td>Cost, weight variation, shell integrity<\/td><\/tr>
Hygroscopic powders<\/td>Evaluate HPMC; consider pullulan<\/td>Moisture migration, brittleness, stability<\/td><\/tr>
Probi\u00f3ticos<\/td>Evaluate HPMC<\/td>Viability, water activity, oxygen exposure<\/td><\/tr>
Oxygen-sensitive ingredients<\/td>Consider pullulan if grade-specific data support it<\/td>Oxidation, shell barrier, final packaging<\/td><\/tr>
Botanical extracts<\/td>Gelatin or HPMC<\/td>Shell\u2013fill interactions, dissolution<\/td><\/tr>
Pellets and granules<\/td>Any compatible hard shell<\/td>Dosing mechanism, particle integrity<\/td><\/tr>
Poorly flowing powders<\/td>Choose shell for stability needs<\/td>Flow, tamping or dosing settings, weight variation<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Hygroscopic powders and probiotics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Hygroscopic powders may absorb water, clump, lose flowability, or degrade. HPMC is often worth evaluating because its lower inherent moisture can reduce the shell’s initial contribution of water. Pullulan may also be suitable, but environmental humidity and packaging remain important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For probiotics, shell moisture is only one variable. Nutraceutical and dietary supplement manufacturers should measure viable counts after filling and during shelf-life studies, while controlling oxygen exposure and water activity. A material marketed as vegetarian is not automatically optimal for every microbial formulation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vitamins and botanical extracts<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Vitamin formulations differ: some are mainly moisture-sensitive, while others are vulnerable to oxidation. Botanical extracts may interact with capsule polymers or gelling systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The green tea extract findings show why formulation-specific dissolution testing is valuable before switching from gelatin to HPMC [5]. The best shell is the one that maintains the required quality attributes\u2014not simply the one with the lowest advertised moisture content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pellets, granules, and difficult powders<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For pellets and granules, the dosing station and particle properties can matter more than the shell polymer. Poorly flowing powders may require changes in particle engineering, powder-bed height, or dosing settings. When determining dose capacity, the capsule size and fill-volume relationship<\/a> also needs attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An automatic capsule filler<\/strong> cannot compensate for unsuitable powder flow merely by changing from gelatin to HPMC. Shell compatibility and dosing performance should be optimized together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. Can Gelatin, HPMC and Pullulan Run on the Same Automatic Capsule Filling Machine?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Often, yes, provided the specific shell grade, dimensions, and machine configuration are compatible.<\/strong> Gelatin and HPMC are routinely processed on modern hard capsule filling equipment. Pullulan should be checked against the capsule supplier’s requirements and a representative filling trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A typical hard capsule filling machine<\/strong> feeds and orients empty capsules, separates caps and bodies, doses the fill and locks the capsules, and discharges the finished units. This capsule manufacturing and filling process<\/a> follows the same basic sequence regardless of shell polymer, although the operating window may change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Automatic
Ruida Packing’s NJP-1500D automatic capsule filling machine<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What shell changes can cause on the machine<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Shell or process condition<\/th>Possible symptom<\/th>What to check<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Gelatin loses excessive moisture<\/td>Cracked or split caps and bodies<\/td>Shell moisture, storage, handling pressure<\/td><\/tr>
Shell becomes too moist or soft<\/td>Deformation, feeding or closing problems<\/td>Relative humidity, exposure time, dimensions<\/td><\/tr>
Different flexibility or tolerances<\/td>Incomplete locking<\/td>Format parts, closing depth, shell specifications<\/td><\/tr>
Poor cap-body separation<\/td>Unopened or rejected capsules<\/td>Vacuum, alignment, shell quality<\/td><\/tr>
Electrostatic charging<\/td>Powder adhesion, inconsistent handling<\/td>Humidity, grounding, powder and shell surfaces<\/td><\/tr>
Higher reject rate after switching<\/td>Cracks, leakage, loose caps<\/td>Shell batch, settings, intended operating speed<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

These are troubleshooting possibilities, not universal defects associated with particular polymers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Feeding, separation, and locking<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

A pharmaceutical capsule filling machine<\/strong> must open each capsule without deforming it and then close it securely after dosing. Brittle shells may crack during separation or locking. Dimensional differences between suppliers can also affect fit, even when capsules have the same nominal size.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When separation performance falls, inspect capsule storage, vacuum settings, alignment, and tooling before increasing mechanical force. When closing quality changes, check locking depth and shell condition. These are common causes of capsule separation and locking problems<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fill accuracy and static electricity<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Capsule material is only one influence on fill-weight consistency. In an automatic capsule filling study, Nair and colleagues found that powder flow, tamping-pin settings, and powder-bed height affected capsule fill weight and variation [6]. Results from one machine and formulation should not become universal claims about gelatin or HPMC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Electrostatic behavior is another check. A 2025 study involving capsules for dry-powder inhalers found higher post-filling charge on HPMC than gelatin under its investigated conditions. Surface properties and process conditions also mattered, and charging did not appear to be the primary determinant of filling performance [7]. These results should not be generalized to every oral capsule line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tooling changes and trial acceptance<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Switching shell material does not automatically require new format parts. Capsules of the same nominal size may use compatible tooling, but dimensions and locking geometry must be checked. A structured capsule filling machine changeover<\/a> also covers alignment, adjustment, and cleaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before approving a new shell on a m\u00e1quina llenadora de c\u00e1psulas<\/strong>, record separation success, cracked or split shells, incomplete closures, fill-weight variation, leakage, and rejected units. Document shell supplier and batch, capsule size, humidity, machine settings, and intended speed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A brief low-speed trial is not proof of full-scale reliability. Evaluate performance at representative production conditions and confirm the requirements of the applicable quality system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you are comparing capsule shells for a new production line, Embalaje Ruida<\/strong> can help review your capsule size, fill material, and target output against suitable automatic capsule filling machine configurations. Discuss your capsule filling requirements<\/a> with the team.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6. How Should You Choose the Right Capsule Shell?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A practical selection process moves from formulation requirements to manufacturing validation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Identify the principal risk.<\/strong> Is the fill hygroscopic, moisture-sensitive, oxygen-sensitive, chemically reactive, or difficult to dose?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Confirm market requirements.<\/strong> Review animal-origin restrictions, vegetarian claims, certifications, regulatory specifications, and all relevant shell ingredients. A plant-derived polymer does not automatically establish halal, kosher, or pharmaceutical approval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Compare commercial shell grades.<\/strong> Obtain moisture specifications, dimensional tolerances, storage guidance, and relevant dissolution or barrier data. Compare supplier quotes using the same capsule size, color, quality grade, and order volume.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Conduct a representative filling trial.<\/strong> Test the chosen formulation and shell on the intended automatic capsule filling machine. Verify separation, dosing, locking, damage, and rejects. For equipment planning, compare the types and specifications of capsule filling machines<\/a> with the required batch size, capsule format, and production rate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. Validate the finished package.<\/strong> Confirm stability and, where applicable, disintegration and dissolution in the final packaging configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bottom line:<\/strong> Choose gelatin for many conventional, cost-sensitive products; evaluate HPMC when lower shell moisture or non-animal origin is important; and consider pullulan when its documented properties address a specific product need. The final choice must perform consistently from filling through shelf life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Preguntas frecuentes<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n

Is HPMC better than gelatin capsules?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Not universally. HPMC generally has lower inherent moisture and is non-animal, while gelatin remains economical and widely used. Formulation requirements determine the better choice.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

What is the difference between HPMC and pullulan capsules?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

HPMC is cellulose-derived and often selected for lower shell moisture. Pullulan is fermentation-derived and has demonstrated strong oxygen-barrier potential in pure-film studies.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Which capsule is best for hygroscopic powders?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

HPMC is often a useful starting point. Compare moisture migration, stability, and packaging performance before selecting a shell.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Are HPMC capsules suitable for probiotics?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

They may be, but viability also depends on oxygen exposure, water activity, filling conditions, and packaging.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Do gelatin capsules become brittle in low humidity?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Yes. Excessive drying can increase cracking risk. Follow the shell supplier’s storage specifications.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Can gelatin capsules cross-link?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Yes. Certain reactive ingredients and storage conditions can affect gelatin dissolution.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Can one automatic capsule filling machine process all three materials?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Potentially, but confirm the machine’s compatibility with each shell grade and run representative trials.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Does switching to HPMC require new tooling?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Not always. Confirm actual dimensions, format-part compatibility, separation, and locking.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Do HPMC capsules create more static?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Some specific studies observed higher charge after filling, but behavior varies with surface properties and process conditions.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Should capsules use bottles or blisters?<\/h3>\n
\n\n

Choose according to moisture and oxygen sensitivity, shelf-life targets, and finished-product stability data.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Referencias<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

[1] Yang et al. (2020). Moisture sorption and desorption properties of gelatin, HPMC and pullulan hard capsules. PubMed<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] Barham et al. (2015). Moisture diffusion and permeability characteristics of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and hard gelatin capsules. PubMed<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3] Digenis et al. (1994). Cross-linking of gelatin capsules and its relevance to their in vitro-in vivo performance. PubMed<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[4] Xiao et al. (2015). Barrier Properties and Microstructure of Pullulan\u2013Alginate-Based Films. Wiley<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[5] Glube et al. (2013). Capsule shell material impacts the in vitro disintegration and dissolution behaviour of a green tea extract. PMC full text<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[6] Nair et al. (2004). Investigation of various factors affecting encapsulation on the In-Cap automatic capsule-filling machine. PMC full text<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[7] Stankovic-Brandl et al. (2025). Filling process-induced tribo-charging of lubricated and non-lubricated gelatine and HPMC capsules. PubMed<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[8] United States Pharmacopeia (2023). USP General Chapter <1094>: Capsules\u2014Dissolution Testing and Related Quality Attributes. USP official source<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gelatin vs HPMC vs Pullulan capsules: compare shell moisture, brittleness, oxygen protection, dissolution and filling-machine compatibility.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":18334,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_sitemap_exclude":false,"_sitemap_priority":"","_sitemap_frequency":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[49,292,289,290,291],"class_list":["post-18325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-capsule-filling-machine","tag-capsule-shell-materials","tag-gelatin-capsules","tag-hpmc-capsules","tag-pullulan-capsules"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18325"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18325\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18337,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18325\/revisions\/18337"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ruidapacking.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}